{"id":"W2037578666","doi":"10.1016/j.eiar.2007.01.001","title":"Assessing the assessments: Pharmaceuticals in the environment","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","topic":"Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":140,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"European Commission; Public Health Agency of Canada","keywords":"Acknowledgement; Risk analysis (engineering); Risk assessment; Risk management; Precautionary principle; Environmental planning; Value (mathematics); Environmental resource management; Business; Environmental risk assessment; Environmental science; Computer science; Computer security; Biotechnology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01208284,0.001386756,0.001118718,0.003499637,0.0007364044,0.004716012,0.001285061,0.002657295,0.002838969],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01481801,0.0002591296,0.000932099,0.00214107,0.00132389,0.003678485,0.001511438,0.001404156,0.0006464716],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002484973,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00813329,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00870303,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0205652,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9901881,0.004950727,0.0004135647,0.0002476635,0.003974443,0.0002255086],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9890324,0.004506231,0.001151367,0.0002630117,0.004747044,0.00029993],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002082819,0.0002181238,0.00691038,0.005519995,0.0007050809,0.0005152692,0.0002825662,0.02175344,0.006551251,0.0525618,0.04881326,0.8559605],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007322349,0.0009479155,0.01401882,0.007370249,0.001186908,0.001349874,0.002133032,0.01316435,0.01571,0.1237157,0.8201606,0.0001692399],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.02946387,0.6880283,0.04332064,0.07205055,0.002339129,0.0002642812,0.0008606354,0.0002101621,0.1634625],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2885388,0.6387648,0.04076254,0.00878059,0.001936058,0.0001598605,0.000414227,0.00006207762,0.02058115],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01208284,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06390089,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06336547692016457,"score_gpt":0.4659907709260957,"score_spread":0.4026252940059311,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}