{"id":"W2037578666","doi":"10.1016/j.eiar.2007.01.001","title":"Assessing the assessments: Pharmaceuticals in the environment","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","topic":"Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":140,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"European Commission; Public Health Agency of Canada","keywords":"Acknowledgement; Risk analysis (engineering); Risk assessment; Risk management; Precautionary principle; Environmental planning; Value (mathematics); Environmental resource management; Business; Environmental risk assessment; Environmental science; Computer science; Computer security; Biotechnology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.006528401,0.000681564,0.0005619685,0.00005534462,0.0004818968,0.0002356888,0.001308421,0.0001176254,0.01580538],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003828658,0.0003600942,0.0004099491,0.0004765862,0.0008929832,0.001189917,0.0006686974,0.001115683,0.001779674],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00165636,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002304023,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007510171,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000717795,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9940851,0.0008160012,0.001097069,0.0007706431,0.001822596,0.001408538],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975443,0.0006673309,0.0003454531,0.001015894,0.000001230976,0.000425744],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002663972,0.003859846,0.7467374,0.0002346391,0.0001710942,0.000412571,0.0003790777,0.0005266924,0.04137491,0.0001681521,0.008449623,0.1976594],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007234385,0.0001834469,0.9194332,0.000318376,0.0002056932,0.0001494219,0.0004748004,0.0004013208,0.0008717794,0.0001651158,0.07649919,0.0005742058],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9114659,0.01671291,0.003651831,0.007945277,0.0003179406,0.004526353,0.00003387321,0.00008635171,0.05525951],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9665719,0.01774312,0.0008927655,0.01433241,0.00008189971,0.00006243186,0.00005653218,0.00005198613,0.0002069016],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1970852,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998851,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06336547692016457,"score_gpt":0.4659907709260957,"score_spread":0.4026252940059311,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}