{"id":"W2037777581","doi":"10.5206/cjsotl-rcacea.2010.1.5","title":"The Effectiveness of Library Instruction: Do Student Response Systems (Clickers) Enhance Learning?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning","topic":"Innovative Teaching Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Clicker; Session (web analytics); Class (philosophy); Psychology; Mathematics education; Significant difference; Library instruction; Multimedia; Computer science; Pedagogy; Mathematics; Information literacy; World Wide Web; Statistics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.1163042,0.000133554,0.000215895,0.0001496344,0.01698167,0.0009327544,0.0009068559,0.0001268835,0.00001201997],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02801814,0.00007486025,0.0001121635,0.0002608232,0.0009581352,0.000412898,0.00004695183,0.006939997,8.57578e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000094637,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008318566,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008813681,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00460331,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9714589,0.02726327,0.0003577708,0.0001526159,0.0003624665,0.0004050187],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9832333,0.01563955,0.0005084794,0.0002262128,0.0002047621,0.0001877265],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002002526,0.00002653832,0.3161118,0.0001301775,0.0004861561,0.000008107137,0.1214267,0.003616997,0.01521887,0.4284175,0.0001449158,0.1124097],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001121305,0.0006111924,0.3956448,0.0009478561,0.0001599486,0.0001936202,0.1066308,0.0001924462,0.001157084,0.01328005,0.4795893,0.0004716068],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.992529,0.0009727572,0.0004829142,0.002058046,0.001757877,0.0003514447,0.000002018379,0.00002179917,0.001824159],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968876,0.000027089,0.0005493863,0.00002361249,0.00042431,0.00001230537,4.527783e-7,0.00002515638,0.002050095],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4794444,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9977867,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02632168783430768,"score_gpt":0.3704594164618277,"score_spread":0.34413772862752,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}