{"id":"W2037832308","doi":"10.3138/cjccj.2010.e.27","title":"Subverting and Negotiating Risk Assessment: A Case Study of the LSI in a Canadian Youth Custody Facility","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice/La Revue canadienne de criminologie et de justice pénale","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Risk management; Psychology; Criminology; Risk assessment; Case management; Public relations; Business; Political science; Law; Psychiatry; Computer security; Computer science; Finance","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003362903,0.000961174,0.0005081372,0.00161633,0.03248375,0.003586307,0.003769702,0.002307057,0.002524261],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01059069,0.0006647089,0.0004936989,0.001919111,0.009189195,0.001386327,0.004743878,0.004759643,0.0002221531],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04990128,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05803623,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8483913,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9597678,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9922011,0.002700479,0.0001806447,0.0004409151,0.001598731,0.002878063],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948859,0.001143628,0.0007444985,0.0001899728,0.001005459,0.002030547],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001135905,0.0008971481,0.09368201,0.0002275242,0.00004332274,0.06068243,0.7744563,0.002001971,0.002412139,0.01304752,0.006268617,0.0461674],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001470432,0.0002640822,0.03692058,0.0002516259,0.0000304168,0.009156504,0.9279773,0.002043252,0.0009006756,0.0009107582,0.02144891,0.00008121053],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9815383,0.0002949222,0.002109439,0.004037834,0.00003850817,0.0002544202,0.00004788153,0.00002716675,0.01165155],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9913774,0.0004729497,0.002639545,0.0004221081,0.00001290034,0.00006130771,0.00002192324,0.0000194671,0.004972494],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1516087,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3620608,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1001775226111822,"score_gpt":0.3447875042189069,"score_spread":0.2446099816077246,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}