{"id":"W2037855854","doi":"10.1016/j.agwat.2009.12.001","title":"Evaluation of FAO Penman–Monteith and alternative methods for estimating reference evapotranspiration with missing data in Southern Ontario, Canada","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Agricultural Water Management","topic":"Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":367,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico","keywords":"Evapotranspiration; Penman–Monteith equation; Missing data; Lysimeter; Environmental science; Vapour Pressure Deficit; Wind speed; Irrigation; Hydrology (agriculture); Semi-arid climate; Meteorology; Climatology; Mathematics; Geography; Statistics; Arid; Soil science; Ecology; Soil water","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009926005,0.0007839306,0.0008533038,0.001885069,0.002399809,0.001880882,0.002361579,0.0007581016,0.001673446],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02276862,0.0006085931,0.0007206268,0.003805317,0.000756498,0.0008291047,0.0007423433,0.0004786172,0.0001966488],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02712804,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02449632,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9921928,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9929628,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973338,0.001144692,0.0002378869,0.0003847191,0.0006314651,0.000267518],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9893406,0.005370432,0.0006052892,0.0005573166,0.003836206,0.0002902123],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00271345,0.0003189572,0.3506185,0.0006562758,0.0009778135,0.0004310057,0.002377846,0.4538831,0.001497815,0.005245969,0.006929043,0.1743503],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003685728,0.0001357981,0.308946,0.0001789545,0.0003224506,0.0001133923,0.001783421,0.6784985,0.001895202,0.001033832,0.006563388,0.0001604661],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9665563,0.001372003,0.02072776,0.0004109758,0.00005274706,0.0002718198,0.004734373,0.0003752459,0.005498738],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9642674,0.0003502052,0.02971522,0.00004059804,0.000008661984,0.0001213552,0.003149973,0.00009109426,0.002255373],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02712804,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1968286,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03973551187776584,"score_gpt":0.2802804098613118,"score_spread":0.2405448979835459,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}