{"id":"W2037891140","doi":"10.5539/ibr.v6n4p1","title":"Characteristics Pertinent to the Ombudsman’s Offices: Evidence in Banks in Brazil","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Business Research","topic":"Brazilian Legal Issues","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Accounting; Documentation; Corporate governance; Sample (material); Business; Subsidy; Content analysis; Documentary evidence; Political science; Public relations; Finance; Sociology; Law; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004891211,0.0001857822,0.0003307097,0.00395388,0.001553264,0.002353433,0.0006129593,0.0007158438,0.00222557],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03781736,0.0003918547,0.0002829501,0.00784067,0.002442451,0.002070027,0.001528004,0.0006193037,0.0001842119],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00295235,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005191813,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04475301,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08618677,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9958004,0.001111922,0.0007501294,0.0004783211,0.001460031,0.000399229],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9324091,0.02251585,0.0337889,0.001864909,0.006915964,0.002505253],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004849824,0.00005681737,0.9261258,0.0006609777,0.00003423963,0.0005066715,0.04413369,0.00006188159,0.0003844487,0.001964918,0.001081553,0.02494058],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002812797,0.00003263177,0.9409796,0.0005320904,0.00002098766,0.0003484685,0.05059826,0.00006582591,0.0001263259,0.0002232213,0.007056704,0.00001314241],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9907499,0.002880959,0.0001684221,0.001279403,0.00001824604,0.00003959759,0.0002410629,0.000003705836,0.0046188],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983597,0.001197602,0.0001004623,0.00008258171,0.000009311208,0.00001201757,0.00008918242,0.000002297904,0.0001468573],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04475301,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08898503,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1358563087675222,"score_gpt":0.451457696471131,"score_spread":0.3156013877036088,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}