{"id":"W2037921054","doi":"10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2012.08.006","title":"Magnetic field effects on natural convection flow of a nanofluid in a horizontal cylindrical annulus using Lattice Boltzmann method","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Thermal Sciences","topic":"Nanofluid Flow and Heat Transfer","field":"Engineering","cited_by":215,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Nanofluid; Hartmann number; Nusselt number; Annulus (botany); Lattice Boltzmann methods; Materials science; Natural convection; Mechanics; Rayleigh number; Heat transfer; Magnetic field; Thermal conductivity; Physics; Reynolds number; Composite material; Turbulence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005648179,0.00009282189,0.000162001,0.0002582638,0.00002691928,0.00002651247,0.0002745234,0.00005566155,0.00005351448],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006267199,0.00007156426,0.00009612602,0.0001673506,0.00003759827,0.000403562,0.00001526027,0.0002058339,0.000003406664],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008305309,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002924235,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000422669,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000006997183,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988935,0.00006526704,0.0003103371,0.00006878511,0.0004739257,0.0001881561],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995089,0.000267306,0.00004292164,0.00003691371,0.0000845192,0.00005940617],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002900959,0.0001543991,0.01036802,0.00003503521,0.00008498583,0.0000489036,0.001179238,0.01375565,0.9111444,0.0005931014,0.00006501168,0.0622812],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001709832,0.001570903,0.04546351,0.0004743213,0.00005456101,0.000449074,0.0001554148,0.1775977,0.7716582,0.0001946516,0.0003730539,0.0002987869],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9892582,0.001295243,0.005177078,0.0001620959,0.00330259,0.00005429353,0.000001802384,0.000008782816,0.0007399219],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9938452,0.00003130658,0.00555118,0.00007711809,0.0004811593,9.455207e-7,2.085723e-7,0.000006217339,0.000006639196],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1638421,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2918306,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0134105677411597,"score_gpt":0.2873557332486826,"score_spread":0.2739451655075229,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}