{"id":"W2038040429","doi":"10.1142/s1464333209003361","title":"INTEGRATING CUMULATIVE EFFECTS IN REGIONAL STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FRAMEWORKS: LESSONS FROM PRACTICE","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":71,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Strategic environmental assessment; Cumulative effects; Sustainability; Context (archaeology); Pace; Environmental planning; Scale (ratio); Environmental impact assessment; Environmental resource management; Regional planning; Sustainable development; Political science; Environmental science; Geography; Urban planning; Engineering; Civil engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008305136,0.0005953241,0.0006568104,0.0002597565,0.0002983642,0.0001647391,0.0004958994,0.0002816375,0.0005616079],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002484749,0.0005401136,0.0002296664,0.0002645566,0.0003850076,0.001550325,0.0004738459,0.001252152,0.00003702284],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002973756,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003959979,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002531372,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002549072,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9956163,0.0004747502,0.001113622,0.0006421896,0.00143589,0.000717222],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978608,0.0003991738,0.0009640737,0.0003560511,0.000003072474,0.0004168396],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001124522,0.02659673,0.2782903,0.0001567694,0.002380159,0.003699204,0.01021792,0.009532226,0.09090063,0.1015894,0.002758282,0.4727538],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002938925,0.001182648,0.9477037,0.0002159502,0.0002358973,0.00006315343,0.007570882,0.0008627143,0.0001043251,0.03349004,0.004988995,0.0006427655],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9583094,0.0004234287,0.002123915,0.006885278,0.0002650898,0.001033636,0.00005447286,0.00002584611,0.03087899],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9601653,0.003904371,0.03123875,0.004069121,0.0002522395,0.00002636452,0.00004124781,0.00003684122,0.0002658274],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6694134,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999705,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01780753825569572,"score_gpt":0.3527835376415143,"score_spread":0.3349759993858186,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}