{"id":"W2038286013","doi":"10.1016/j.proeng.2011.07.321","title":"Contractual Risks in Fast-Track Projects","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Procedia Engineering","topic":"Construction Project Management and Performance","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"University of Asia Pacific","keywords":"Rework; Liability; Track (disk drive); Risk analysis (engineering); Damages; Cost overrun; Business; Work (physics); Duration (music); Integrated project delivery; Actuarial science; Computer science; Project management; Finance; Engineering; Construction industry; Construction engineering; Systems engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008767711,0.0001290444,0.000169487,0.0005202739,0.00003331647,0.00008075518,0.0003509036,0.00005460851,0.0004242258],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008085151,0.000109023,0.00004313916,0.0008321996,0.00002293529,0.0005852522,0.00007478559,0.0001902711,0.0002623537],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002336931,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003650931,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005455966,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004366824,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985768,0.00001173527,0.0003992457,0.0003044102,0.0004221001,0.0002857192],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994223,0.0001348748,0.0000801942,0.0002212007,0.00008160085,0.00005989465],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001047647,0.0001231798,0.619238,0.00009216335,0.00003275006,0.00004520639,0.01629559,0.002237257,0.0009204331,0.009198497,0.0009375945,0.3507745],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001416159,0.0001253719,0.8262015,0.00008379108,0.00001663194,0.00004826267,0.002567301,0.1329611,0.006960738,0.002091917,0.02673182,0.0007953483],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.974224,0.00008068483,0.004199624,0.00003525201,0.0006908341,0.0003004919,0.000001904253,0.000140716,0.02032649],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968557,0.00001794976,0.002625481,0.00003033644,0.00009166168,0.00004318214,7.072761e-7,0.00001097448,0.0003240271],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3499792,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4644975,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2078541754641793,"score_gpt":0.3426838451042296,"score_spread":0.1348296696400503,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}