{"id":"W2038315717","doi":"10.1016/j.yrtph.2013.12.009","title":"Investigating predictability of in vitro toxicological assessments of cigarettes: Analysis of 7years of regulatory submissions to Canadian regulatory authorities","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology","topic":"Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sidestream smoke; Predictability; In vitro toxicology; In vitro; Tobacco product; Toxicology; Cigarette smoke; Risk analysis (engineering); Biotechnology; Computer science; Biology; Environmental health; Medicine; Statistics; Mathematics; Biochemistry","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01362228,0.0005293119,0.0006688607,0.004619253,0.001883586,0.00268541,0.001463959,0.0006636641,0.001484304],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02335363,0.0002789273,0.0007269574,0.004195473,0.001095792,0.0007522448,0.00121927,0.0007686539,0.0004105724],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01033127,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01247284,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6667441,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6333587,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9800283,0.001271166,0.001068193,0.001499627,0.01524664,0.0008861854],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9498317,0.009145991,0.009347616,0.003048891,0.02758216,0.001043623],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001084062,0.0002090566,0.896151,0.0007155146,0.0004263094,0.0005060913,0.003420859,0.005326465,0.02136523,0.001275141,0.003183356,0.06633685],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006032089,0.0002560184,0.9762468,0.00006612429,0.0001133698,0.0001321562,0.001311055,0.003088193,0.007839094,0.0002010816,0.01068066,0.0000593263],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9618193,0.005017599,0.00449742,0.0005889929,0.00008157281,0.0004033794,0.009168006,0.0001359853,0.01828784],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9875523,0.001409952,0.001195608,0.00009866362,0.00003091096,0.00006206569,0.005818118,0.00002490867,0.00380752],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3332559,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6704371,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0187330357812631,"score_gpt":0.3139771531169421,"score_spread":0.295244117335679,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}