{"id":"W2038320992","doi":"10.1073/pnas.0908906107","title":"Expert judgments about transient climate response to alternative future trajectories of radiative forcing","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences","topic":"Climate variability and models","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":95,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; University of Victoria","funders":"Electric Power Research Institute; Carnegie Mellon University; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Radiative forcing; Forcing (mathematics); Climate change; Cloud forcing; Environmental science; Climatology; Range (aeronautics); Climate sensitivity; Radiative transfer; Expert elicitation; Global temperature; Global warming; Climate model; Atmospheric sciences; Meteorology; Geography; Physics; Geology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002205444,0.0001009671,0.0001628716,0.00008556533,0.0001885962,0.00001357662,0.0007144181,0.00007150259,0.00009453131],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004037335,0.0000683661,0.00007705952,0.0005704053,0.000903074,0.0004984463,0.0001760069,0.0001603623,0.000001910518],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005742415,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001500356,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000389685,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001457113,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980932,0.00001367189,0.0003370965,0.0002736408,0.001091868,0.0001905461],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993732,0.0001772006,0.0003053642,0.00001349978,0.00007392082,0.00005683727],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001849499,0.00006953117,0.007300935,0.00001982793,0.00000726237,3.453179e-9,0.007418961,0.001566422,0.9752226,0.007767728,0.000138524,0.0003032359],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003016288,0.0001351751,0.2448169,0.00007470012,0.000009325487,0.000002409264,0.001289366,0.003178236,0.7370254,0.01225454,0.0007743617,0.0001379168],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9933003,0.00001244868,0.000004136577,0.003174921,0.00007412973,0.0002664693,0.00005207531,0.000006269308,0.003109242],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967568,0.00002442007,0.002857163,0.0002580731,0.00005516968,0.00001664059,8.341515e-8,0.000003571651,0.00002810369],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2381972,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3327414,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0284447662303717,"score_gpt":0.3029548122716353,"score_spread":0.2745100460412636,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}