{"id":"W2038485292","doi":"10.1016/j.rse.2004.02.011","title":"Leaf area index measurements in a tropical moist forest: A case study from Costa Rica","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Remote Sensing of Environment","topic":"Remote Sensing in Agriculture","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":79,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Leaf area index; Canopy; Vegetation (pathology); Remote sensing; Range (aeronautics); Regression; Environmental science; Tropical forest; Index (typography); Nonparametric statistics; Mathematics; Geography; Statistics; Ecology; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005084428,0.0002866518,0.0002509632,0.0005860142,0.0007587673,0.0005004921,0.0006229215,0.0005072404,0.000292984],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001077151,0.0001380901,0.0002222618,0.001266408,0.0005758047,0.0002463193,0.0004722965,0.0001885907,0.00007567587],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001297465,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005611853,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2535905,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4486731,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996998,0.0001285106,0.0000190244,0.00004697417,0.00005544694,0.00005019931],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994969,0.0001860938,0.00008945139,0.00006860255,0.0001107227,0.00004819355],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002067019,0.0002751616,0.9534943,0.0001191996,0.0001343949,0.006889992,0.006524303,0.002125306,0.009832514,0.0002702145,0.0004298226,0.01969822],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001464304,0.00005862855,0.9909855,0.00001692726,0.00005334882,0.000705842,0.003887064,0.002567659,0.0008352739,0.00004476495,0.0008196841,0.00001063064],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9990721,0.00006723487,0.00007605411,0.0000298926,5.615215e-7,0.00001229045,0.00009271089,0.000003581716,0.0006455551],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999292,0.00008513773,0.0003142362,0.00001599163,0.000001388389,0.000007359301,0.00008767198,0.000002429014,0.0001936793],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2535905,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5042288,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02483125443404668,"score_gpt":0.2291493787054775,"score_spread":0.2043181242714308,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}