{"id":"W2038547861","doi":"10.1080/15239080701381355","title":"Greenbelts as an Environmental Planning Tool: A Case Study of Southern Ontario, Canada","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning","topic":"Environmental Conservation and Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Compromise; Strengths and weaknesses; Environmental planning; Environmental resource management; Geography; Boundary (topology); Environmental protection; Political science; Environmental science; Psychology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00117032,0.00039566,0.0002690156,0.0007974214,0.01322291,0.002419006,0.001277353,0.0009613668,0.003824814],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002533406,0.0002989735,0.0002567946,0.003081052,0.002235634,0.0006945272,0.0011533,0.0008212067,0.0002354816],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.067181,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06598616,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9941272,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9989954,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985146,0.0003241552,0.00003753116,0.00009439367,0.0005594109,0.000469923],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981673,0.0004366464,0.0001079964,0.00006386575,0.0007753357,0.0004487738],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006168737,0.001480024,0.3841584,0.001362463,0.0001891649,0.04072671,0.2992984,0.03135693,0.007068582,0.03949271,0.04180878,0.1524409],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001397708,0.0005017633,0.2209127,0.0004555055,0.0001250493,0.001338266,0.5546131,0.01541507,0.001894287,0.001726529,0.2027372,0.0001408302],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9599406,0.0003825463,0.0009360103,0.001861425,0.00001871451,0.0002252203,0.0003683736,0.00003021336,0.03623688],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9812799,0.0006566282,0.002433348,0.0002233796,0.000005475039,0.00009420887,0.0002724428,0.00002141729,0.01501323],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.067181,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4874346,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01806191758537838,"score_gpt":0.2595662763930671,"score_spread":0.2415043588076887,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}