{"id":"W2038547861","doi":"10.1080/15239080701381355","title":"Greenbelts as an Environmental Planning Tool: A Case Study of Southern Ontario, Canada","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning","topic":"Environmental Conservation and Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Compromise; Strengths and weaknesses; Environmental planning; Environmental resource management; Geography; Boundary (topology); Environmental protection; Political science; Environmental science; Psychology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000878997,0.0004105855,0.0004550993,0.0002098075,0.000294203,0.00003373715,0.0004723642,0.00009910053,0.002396976],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001944534,0.0004010821,0.0001302707,0.0001530201,0.0002167324,0.0005467741,0.000404992,0.0004877099,0.00005052831],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002469321,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000908033,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8113499,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6627575,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9963189,0.0001239344,0.001236007,0.0004169068,0.001307518,0.0005967543],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980706,0.00009661361,0.0009755701,0.000423016,0.000002227791,0.0004319915],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003503316,0.001683036,0.9349424,0.000009519573,0.0001719077,0.01223285,0.0230477,0.01078488,0.01059759,0.000003212865,0.0009148609,0.005261732],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00322846,0.002350872,0.8120682,0.00005506887,0.0001724138,0.005856199,0.1628698,0.0001121702,0.0009534869,0.00006300623,0.01157013,0.0007002001],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9979203,0.00006296171,0.00007783049,0.00006894363,0.0001379583,0.0003915891,0.00003929997,0.00001134691,0.001289786],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971409,0.000005100479,0.0004435054,0.001153505,0.0001388015,0.000003993299,0.0000148396,0.00005021877,0.001049154],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1485925,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998441,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01806191758537838,"score_gpt":0.2595662763930671,"score_spread":0.2415043588076887,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}