{"id":"W2038778453","doi":"10.1016/j.engfailanal.2005.07.008","title":"Structural integrity of aging buried pipelines having cathodic protection","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Engineering Failure Analysis","topic":"Material Properties and Failure Mechanisms","field":"Materials Science","cited_by":108,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Cathodic protection; Hydrogen embrittlement; Pipeline (software); Cracking; Pipeline transport; Embrittlement; Materials science; Reliability (semiconductor); Forensic engineering; Hydrogen; Natural gas; Metallurgy; Composite material; Engineering; Corrosion; Waste management; Mechanical engineering; Anode; Chemistry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001964584,0.0001950375,0.0002060848,0.0004365974,0.0002619172,0.0002190879,0.0004863198,0.0003902534,0.001200147],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006685153,0.0001891082,0.0001296122,0.0002693322,0.0004172849,0.0004245728,0.0001764614,0.0002186351,0.0001936296],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003060653,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002627338,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001767015,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001698481,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9999005,0.000009055889,0.000005066163,0.00002392298,0.00003974367,0.00002171848],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995402,0.00009425751,0.0001200276,0.00006501061,0.0001443935,0.00003619621],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001000971,0.00007567333,0.01454271,0.00007351471,0.00002721807,0.0002874989,0.0002045596,0.02410092,0.946907,0.0006139125,0.0001837667,0.01198234],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004526423,0.002435119,0.1845855,0.00001964587,0.00009631334,0.0006427356,0.0003352535,0.2439806,0.565551,0.0007876688,0.001469551,0.00005135893],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9984635,0.00004942983,0.001140898,0.00000826711,0.00000210726,0.000001775908,0.00006706754,0.00001768975,0.0002491854],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993876,0.00001734866,0.0002552191,0.000001869412,9.922107e-7,0.000001103036,0.00007208539,0.000003069641,0.0002607417],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.001767015,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.00401485,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01303992628310676,"score_gpt":0.2158403939603448,"score_spread":0.2028004676772381,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}