{"id":"W2038972325","doi":"10.1016/j.envpol.2009.05.005","title":"An integrated tool to assess the role of new planting in PM10 capture and the human health benefits: A case study in London","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Pollution","topic":"Air Quality and Health Impacts","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":183,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; Met Office; Canada Excellence Research Chairs, Government of Canada; Greater London Authority; Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, UK Government","keywords":"Environmental science; Vegetation (pathology); Air pollution; Forestry; Particulates; Interception; Human health; Population; Geography; Grassland; Air quality index; Atmospheric dispersion modeling; Environmental health; Physical geography; Ecology; Meteorology; Biology; Medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001221328,0.0001290439,0.0001904836,0.00004403436,0.0002215529,0.00002103466,0.0001380821,0.00005195484,0.00005435691],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001779877,0.00008373737,0.00001757956,0.0001841735,0.0001118914,0.0002127186,0.00006248271,0.0002470883,0.000007184562],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003564032,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001624135,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04484541,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02480787,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998502,0.0003725409,0.0003732568,0.0002387256,0.0002295404,0.0002839576],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995013,0.00003179107,0.0001241238,0.0002208527,4.327767e-7,0.0001215002],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003864855,0.001539806,0.5609446,0.000009328827,0.000007905143,0.00006575309,0.09363432,0.01675609,0.004625014,0.000544742,0.0002044341,0.3212815],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001367621,0.0005781564,0.9641375,0.00002578395,0.000004554989,0.00006737097,0.03191796,0.001137133,0.0001505473,0.0002725854,0.0002363076,0.0001045039],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9958181,0.0002091394,0.00004632539,0.002840577,0.00001421247,0.0009882071,0.00001696065,0.000008448666,0.00005801353],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971299,0.00002360443,0.0001358439,0.002652703,0.00001791359,0.000008968509,0.000007840192,0.000006123068,0.00001706847],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4031929,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9929869,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03186161666275399,"score_gpt":0.3125237048872361,"score_spread":0.2806620882244821,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}