{"id":"W2039101902","doi":"10.1016/j.ribaf.2012.03.002","title":"Financial guarantors’ executive compensation, charter value and risk-taking","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research in International Business and Finance","topic":"Corporate Finance and Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Shareholder; Moral hazard; Incentive; Business; Risk appetite; Compensation (psychology); Agency cost; Finance; Principal–agent problem; Value (mathematics); Agency (philosophy); Actuarial science; Executive compensation; Accounting; Economics; Risk management; Microeconomics; Corporate governance; Computer science; Law; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00304053,0.0002013193,0.0002556011,0.0009509375,0.0007344714,0.002751051,0.0004088712,0.0009517251,0.006807026],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02686763,0.0001826685,0.0002925876,0.000888346,0.001074975,0.002181482,0.0006808885,0.001609925,0.0008009464],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008476462,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008791341,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008154397,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01071917,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993162,0.0001826031,0.0000911463,0.00007638901,0.0001462278,0.0001874518],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9500306,0.01620827,0.02427345,0.001320971,0.003136557,0.005030235],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004630832,0.0002877917,0.9686049,0.00002572246,0.0001165864,0.0003516934,0.001471833,0.001469873,0.0002358368,0.007930882,0.001997692,0.01704409],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002290618,0.00009899872,0.9900242,0.00002465267,0.00004877972,0.0001615203,0.001273856,0.000855402,0.0001639253,0.005863674,0.001442257,0.00001980565],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.989862,0.0006740975,0.0002684656,0.0007943154,0.00002560711,0.000004396414,0.0001203545,0.00001068403,0.008240058],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979708,0.0001141921,0.00005048246,0.00002237169,0.00003093451,0.000001504426,0.00007868305,0.000003475525,0.001727499],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.008154397,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02277178,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05333609667799184,"score_gpt":0.3057051260572275,"score_spread":0.2523690293792357,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}