{"id":"W2039163463","doi":"10.1145/2346536.2346559","title":"Concession patterns in multi-issue negotiations and reverse auctions","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Auction Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Negotiation; Common value auction; Bidding; Reverse auction; Work (physics); Forward auction; Computer science; Business; Microeconomics; Eauction; Industrial organization; Auction theory; Economics; Marketing; Engineering; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009301612,0.00006849808,0.0001014502,0.0001596453,0.0002209609,0.00005459751,0.0001469744,0.00005135777,0.003355196],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004235646,0.00005026548,0.00002773611,0.0004916361,0.00007442942,0.0006491254,0.00006323722,0.00009318338,0.0008892245],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001655318,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000124049,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008156168,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001035673,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989842,0.0001263622,0.0003132632,0.0001997115,0.0002158346,0.0001606586],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990525,0.0003985387,0.00008740486,0.0002740588,0.00006219678,0.0001252506],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008746679,0.0004011862,0.8647037,0.000003221641,0.000006574082,5.332e-7,0.004145964,0.0001305162,0.002011219,0.08282473,0.014955,0.0308086],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006245411,0.00001529891,0.6736013,0.00001407047,0.00001057847,0.00002064072,0.01666991,0.001717512,0.001992539,0.01341937,0.291672,0.0002422422],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5848323,0.0001241617,0.3993927,0.005835881,0.0006941962,0.0003508785,0.00003227217,0.0000954421,0.008642158],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9841796,0.00001872452,0.002492205,0.0003546638,0.00009304509,0.0000325444,0.000003396277,0.000004006098,0.0128218],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3993473,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998887,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1953483359184461,"score_gpt":0.455726063243571,"score_spread":0.260377727325125,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}