{"id":"W2039249711","doi":"10.1177/0194599814556725","title":"Systematic Review of the Quality of Economic Evaluations in the Otolaryngology Literature","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Otolaryngology","topic":"Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Otorhinolaryngology; Checklist; Economic evaluation; Medicine; Psychological intervention; Systematic review; MEDLINE; Quality (philosophy); Publishing; Transparency (behavior); Actuarial science; Family medicine; Surgery; Psychology; Computer science; Nursing; Pathology; Business; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1815815,0.002558554,0.01451586,0.02354345,0.001538358,0.008906626,0.003624893,0.003251154,0.003962959],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5631945,0.002423042,0.0126182,0.02095537,0.003114946,0.005237631,0.003773289,0.002515469,0.0002914206],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01289148,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02629952,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007201782,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01410723,"domain_scores_codex":[0.7101805,0.1516391,0.09555176,0.006646608,0.03416307,0.001819073],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.3061496,0.5650698,0.08706156,0.007365205,0.03290999,0.001443867],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000463095,0.00002646404,0.003139325,0.9353623,0.02679878,0.00008941176,0.0003189792,0.000250739,0.00009014973,0.0005949678,0.001276167,0.03158962],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005275013,0.0002283609,0.008485734,0.899371,0.0812642,0.0002964271,0.0004571675,0.0003414862,0.0003199561,0.001109751,0.007534618,0.00006377889],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.004534258,0.9886784,0.001579792,0.001419488,0.0004666465,0.001529149,0.001023349,0.0000223095,0.0007466441],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1435498,0.8363246,0.008809753,0.002174573,0.0005542104,0.006899509,0.001403334,0.00005906046,0.000225194],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8184185,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9603063,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2472956742173394,"score_gpt":0.4892318270988334,"score_spread":0.241936152881494,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}