{"id":"W2039249711","doi":"10.1177/0194599814556725","title":"Systematic Review of the Quality of Economic Evaluations in the Otolaryngology Literature","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Otolaryngology","topic":"Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Otorhinolaryngology; Checklist; Economic evaluation; Medicine; Psychological intervention; Systematic review; MEDLINE; Quality (philosophy); Publishing; Transparency (behavior); Actuarial science; Family medicine; Surgery; Psychology; Computer science; Nursing; Pathology; Business; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.06605674,0.0005624711,0.01096532,0.0006106221,0.0001267323,0.00003231399,0.002397012,0.0008249552,0.0002680069],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01852425,0.0004027241,0.001554301,0.0007144886,0.0003371036,0.0001869824,0.0002171746,0.0009074672,0.0006711134],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005534576,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007587317,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003598425,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003918257,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9655209,0.01518508,0.01768645,0.0008818143,0.0001996749,0.0005260785],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9698826,0.008860171,0.01802274,0.003017555,0.0001407572,0.00007617298],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001603858,0.00006312603,0.0003365637,0.8579705,0.0002164373,5.208115e-7,0.0004055132,0.000002307757,2.47831e-8,0.1382675,0.002645668,0.00009015644],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005438792,0.0001073917,0.001579195,0.7449128,0.000750433,0.00016389,0.00009101091,0.00009564417,1.261124e-7,0.007724197,0.2433464,0.0006850205],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.00009840976,0.9842663,0.00008181002,0.004091805,0.0008153947,0.007483463,0.0008153769,0.00001396519,0.00233341],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00019125,0.9907748,0.0001416993,0.006447094,0.0001849885,0.001817791,0.0002115494,0.00005872853,0.0001721549],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2407008,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998425,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2472956742173394,"score_gpt":0.4892318270988334,"score_spread":0.241936152881494,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}