{"id":"W2039279156","doi":"10.1037/0021-9010.92.1.17","title":"The development of collective efficacy in teams: A multilevel and longitudinal perspective.","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Psychology","topic":"Team Dynamics and Performance","field":"Psychology","cited_by":317,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University; Wilfrid Laurier University; McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Teamwork; Collective efficacy; Psychology; Perspective (graphical); Multilevel model; Task (project management); Self-efficacy; Team effectiveness; Social psychology; Longitudinal study; Collective intelligence; Applied psychology; Knowledge management; Computer science; Management","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006832851,0.0003361095,0.0003989291,0.001380312,0.0009484667,0.001809492,0.0005116333,0.0006967663,0.001257871],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0194293,0.0003404273,0.0007399015,0.000720404,0.0008835361,0.001919227,0.002227623,0.001880576,0.0001544031],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001041905,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001339734,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006465538,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007458122,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983973,0.000912624,0.00006417087,0.0002538201,0.0001818318,0.000190292],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9883685,0.004526142,0.002756723,0.001289655,0.001155203,0.00190385],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001030748,0.0004098484,0.953635,0.00005994457,0.0004208059,0.0001708897,0.003978303,0.001781729,0.0008063866,0.007493344,0.0006778166,0.0304629],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001958698,0.0007767091,0.9624114,0.0001939779,0.0002866507,0.0003673381,0.002844766,0.01562334,0.0008576659,0.01368308,0.00288182,0.00005350621],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.973631,0.002547543,0.01829983,0.001507685,0.00007761455,0.00007057172,0.0003615718,0.00006149508,0.003442616],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953382,0.0002517613,0.003808143,0.00004258971,0.0000119884,0.0000558326,0.0001254571,0.000004586207,0.0003613872],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.006832851,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03613603,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02762097581663547,"score_gpt":0.3730029183991134,"score_spread":0.345381942582478,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}