{"id":"W2039279156","doi":"10.1037/0021-9010.92.1.17","title":"The development of collective efficacy in teams: A multilevel and longitudinal perspective.","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Psychology","topic":"Team Dynamics and Performance","field":"Psychology","cited_by":317,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University; Wilfrid Laurier University; McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Teamwork; Collective efficacy; Psychology; Perspective (graphical); Multilevel model; Task (project management); Self-efficacy; Team effectiveness; Social psychology; Longitudinal study; Collective intelligence; Applied psychology; Knowledge management; Computer science; Management","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001649108,0.000130105,0.0002976464,0.0002325797,0.0001072485,0.000008492925,0.0002348619,0.0001317355,0.00004450015],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002940473,0.00009301928,0.00004853889,0.0002569971,0.0002128349,0.00002663199,0.00003136657,0.0004624255,0.000007709462],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001455871,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001254719,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000009494509,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001782386,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985712,0.00003576364,0.0007448256,0.0001905723,0.0001502009,0.0003073927],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998723,0.0004038222,0.0004932958,0.0001680597,0.0001409765,0.00007082172],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.02338667,0.004085663,0.1294235,0.00003497192,0.001232188,0.0001800416,0.2176015,0.00006451902,0.008181463,0.09412343,0.002685707,0.5190003],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003299848,0.000262043,0.9840661,0.0000174179,0.00001275173,0.0001671108,0.006544956,0.00001325186,0.0001349039,0.002036639,0.003337124,0.0001078899],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9595111,0.0004762552,0.002123863,0.0002029984,0.0005008534,0.0001775989,0.000001355618,0.000003813728,0.03700217],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963904,0.00004437543,0.003232584,0.00008100372,0.00009189812,0.00000543791,2.325978e-7,0.00001269313,0.000141375],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8546426,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3793216,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02762097581663547,"score_gpt":0.3730029183991134,"score_spread":0.345381942582478,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}