{"id":"W2039301097","doi":"10.3138/ijcs.2014.009","title":"The Reasonable Accommodations Crisis in Quebec: Racializing Rhetorical Devices in Media and Social Discourse","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Canadian Studies","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetorical question; Exaggeration; Social media; Ethnic group; Sociology; Media studies; Commission; Rhetorical device; Focus (optics); Political science; Public relations; Psychology; Linguistics; Law; Psychoanalysis","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005441389,0.0003902276,0.0003805248,0.003772643,0.03136338,0.01371331,0.001512957,0.002598853,0.005970089],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0139405,0.0003725611,0.0003255659,0.004481268,0.01426819,0.004153633,0.003293241,0.002911871,0.0002165775],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1161624,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06337233,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9871545,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9929028,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9950892,0.002029473,0.0001215504,0.0003866239,0.001432989,0.000940185],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9854935,0.008031413,0.001167628,0.0004192547,0.003751618,0.00113664],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001765239,0.00005804321,0.02774273,0.0003110963,0.00005073464,0.001885615,0.7946607,0.0003883086,0.001990711,0.09247376,0.0258221,0.05443972],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002763812,0.00004021469,0.06491771,0.0005808366,0.00006121642,0.0003564783,0.6602507,0.0007540272,0.001303787,0.004620755,0.2669294,0.0001572549],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7426692,0.01043131,0.002138015,0.0900465,0.0005083815,0.0001022066,0.0005456999,0.00009449323,0.1534642],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9880447,0.0009229155,0.0003204673,0.002315225,0.00005096009,0.00001997358,0.00004309105,0.00001553836,0.008267006],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1161624,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8428214,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03845018367837825,"score_gpt":0.3413777752852494,"score_spread":0.3029275916068711,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}