{"id":"W2039506919","doi":"10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2012.07.002","title":"An evaluability assessment of a West Africa based Non-Governmental Organization's (NGO) progressive evaluation strategy","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evaluation and Program Planning","topic":"Evaluation and Performance Assessment","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Political science; Public relations; Program evaluation; Intervention (counseling); Impact evaluation; Politics; Humanitarian aid; Business; Public administration; Medicine; Nursing","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03050259,0.0002643553,0.0003583912,0.0002801448,0.0003815409,0.000389297,0.000338644,0.0001410392,0.007199037],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001688892,0.000213526,0.00006910591,0.001218287,0.0001476151,0.001575802,0.00006604373,0.0001952282,0.00003129059],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004479302,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001285876,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001275925,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000006431415,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9896802,0.001829519,0.001018723,0.000573408,0.006484169,0.0004139515],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947002,0.0005266636,0.0008868331,0.0006146839,0.002984007,0.0002876341],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003706268,0.0009470105,0.6751505,0.00002243725,0.000031869,2.694271e-7,0.002440162,0.01287163,0.0008576104,0.0002842905,0.0002595146,0.3070977],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001071564,0.000432852,0.5015212,0.00003313863,0.0001058489,0.00000250569,0.003062809,0.4926774,0.0003532378,0.0002689644,0.0003171254,0.0001533833],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9802895,0.0004892429,0.004655567,0.0002586065,0.0003589543,0.003228828,0.00002702357,0.00007896095,0.01061337],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9893255,0.000003344914,0.009561073,0.00008731907,0.0001394708,0.0004989651,0.0003345002,0.00002086633,0.00002901532],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4798057,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983016,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2321556439069593,"score_gpt":0.5669080049354714,"score_spread":0.3347523610285122,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}