{"id":"W2039600624","doi":"10.1016/s0167-6105(00)00007-6","title":"Aerodynamic flutter analysis of cable-supported bridges by multi-mode and full-mode approaches","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics","topic":"Fluid Dynamics and Vibration Analysis","field":"Engineering","cited_by":141,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Flutter; Structural engineering; Aerodynamics; Mode (computer interface); Aeroelasticity; Vibration; Span (engineering); Bridge (graph theory); Stiffness; Engineering; Computer science; Acoustics; Aerospace engineering; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003142985,0.0002912987,0.0007676013,0.0005789407,0.0000479187,0.00008052432,0.0001556548,0.0002668057,0.00005703515],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000418877,0.0002767638,0.0002182673,0.000696111,0.00005267904,0.0002750291,0.00002010761,0.0004580883,6.10633e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008375576,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003012438,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001027481,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008442546,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983907,0.00002956995,0.0008524587,0.0001945388,0.0002558827,0.0002768936],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993087,0.00007342662,0.0001626025,0.0001868589,0.00006705558,0.0002013449],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000402052,0.00004365918,0.001715026,0.00003061642,0.001425146,0.000004100742,0.0001513483,0.98176,0.01081466,0.00001954534,0.000201437,0.003794287],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009269983,0.00007916967,0.004762951,0.00003940688,0.001031602,0.00002501517,0.00006476429,0.9924306,0.0001161875,0.000001871931,0.0002575685,0.0002638495],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9731929,0.0003746553,0.02589243,0.00007737291,0.0001614959,0.00007504226,0.0001473581,0.00003903598,0.00003966214],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971685,0.0007418382,0.001709107,0.00001199111,0.0001165814,0.000001257663,0.00008847035,0.00004109961,0.0001211352],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02418332,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999685,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01809759142868292,"score_gpt":0.2113987679100829,"score_spread":0.1933011764814,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}