{"id":"W2039601322","doi":"10.1890/0012-9623-91.3.325","title":"Pubcreds: Fixing the Peer Review Process by “Privatizing” the Reviewer Commons","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America","topic":"Auction Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":89,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Tragedy of the commons; Exploit; Commons; Incentive; Nothing; Process (computing); Computer science; Law and economics; Business; Political science; Economics; Microeconomics; Law; Computer security; Epistemology; Philosophy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05465022,0.0009493695,0.001727456,0.003291232,0.002736306,0.009244046,0.006274991,0.004553958,0.01379934],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1520813,0.001203191,0.0009471073,0.003201785,0.006526873,0.01308653,0.01209205,0.004212779,0.003515851],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003553985,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00965261,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009889605,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008059207,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9652294,0.0220366,0.001553976,0.003973322,0.00558821,0.001618466],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8135767,0.07424933,0.02299714,0.05928559,0.01871383,0.01117742],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001132845,0.0006145441,0.00947008,0.0006741778,0.000257866,0.0005046119,0.001612053,0.03100453,0.006471397,0.4904564,0.0335682,0.4242333],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001980815,0.001384652,0.005583894,0.0004360595,0.0003443792,0.001483752,0.001076323,0.2595597,0.01142027,0.5660486,0.150156,0.0005255123],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.1126755,0.002475274,0.810894,0.02793664,0.003015102,0.001155673,0.0002169038,0.006588133,0.03504281],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7549421,0.0006891629,0.2192008,0.002515637,0.001794035,0.000773478,0.0001320874,0.0006682648,0.01928432],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9453498,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2890214,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05309777062894605,"score_gpt":0.3574383660561276,"score_spread":0.3043405954271815,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}