{"id":"W2039657737","doi":"10.1139/x07-002","title":"A validation and evaluation of the Prognosis individual-tree basal area increment model","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Forest ecology and management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Rocky Mountain Research Station; U.S. Forest Service","keywords":"Basal area; Statistics; Transect; Model selection; Equivalence (formal languages); Tree (set theory); Cross-validation; Mathematics; Set (abstract data type); Data set; Computer science; Econometrics; Environmental science; Ecology; Geography; Forestry; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01561225,0.000662139,0.0007460862,0.0004908724,0.0005011834,0.0007392509,0.001897927,0.0007918793,0.001138474],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02772025,0.0003648945,0.0005407201,0.000356933,0.0005761239,0.001031919,0.0009112165,0.001002557,0.0003132399],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001266895,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002495941,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02411836,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01283769,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975465,0.001587372,0.0001313733,0.0002881996,0.000314163,0.0001322876],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9810613,0.01340191,0.0005608014,0.001507375,0.003131034,0.0003376363],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004210311,0.0002901391,0.02450444,0.00004753672,0.0001039886,0.00007765194,0.00009003274,0.9536199,0.001188089,0.001894928,0.0005107005,0.01725158],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004794743,0.0001978665,0.003402473,0.000008359035,0.00001602815,0.00001479639,0.00002244222,0.9942514,0.001359063,0.000438635,0.0002300447,0.00001098817],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9055168,0.00009070896,0.09038445,0.0002170906,0.00004692833,0.0001504043,0.0008007684,0.0004223604,0.002370519],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9715573,0.00003644875,0.02703398,0.0000370346,0.000008515432,0.00007458108,0.0006696437,0.00007020229,0.0005122598],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02411836,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0825665,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.09929515013961983,"score_gpt":0.3328690238576744,"score_spread":0.2335738737180546,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}