{"id":"W2039722319","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-121x.2000.tb00142.x","title":"Environmental monitoring of government — the case for an environmental auditor","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Studies","topic":"Regulation and Compliance Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Audit; Accountability; Accounting; Government (linguistics); Argument (complex analysis); House of Commons; Business; Environmental audit; Chief audit executive; Joint audit; Value (mathematics); Audit committee; Internal audit; Public administration; Political science; Law; Medicine; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001024638,0.0001351511,0.0001611685,0.00001118522,0.0004973128,0.00005021099,0.0001154616,0.00001715557,0.0001239654],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000008395981,0.00009400777,0.00007559548,0.00003843936,0.0001591343,0.0004315734,0.00009320062,0.0000416086,0.00004214286],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006086843,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000100728,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005635176,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002668925,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992467,0.000005956827,0.0001894535,0.0001812335,0.0002127225,0.0001639881],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996957,0.00003694618,0.00009737679,0.0001584781,0.000005293238,0.000006222089],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007127228,0.001292487,0.2887333,0.0004366246,0.00167116,0.000163548,0.003555262,0.001673054,0.006980973,0.007000667,0.04052253,0.6472576],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001264477,0.0001213762,0.2496061,0.00004524308,0.0002197322,0.00003058873,0.03628457,0.00102451,0.0008623328,0.0008398222,0.709235,0.0004661916],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9954011,0.001043415,0.00001293609,0.0005245575,0.0004149075,0.0002829065,0.00002333294,0.0000223406,0.002274546],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963493,0.0001578159,0.00009040619,0.000161457,0.0017109,0.00008478757,0.000002478337,0.00001265757,0.001430227],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6687125,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3833526,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03086616862597272,"score_gpt":0.2507681898323116,"score_spread":0.2199020212063389,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}