{"id":"W2039729958","doi":"10.1002/spip.298","title":"Using Data Envelopment Analysis in software development productivity measurement","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Software Process Improvement and Practice","topic":"Software Engineering Research","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Benchmarking; Data envelopment analysis; Productivity; Software; Computer science; Function point; Software development; Function (biology); Regression analysis; Process (computing); Linear regression; Industrial engineering; Engineering; Statistics; Business; Mathematics; Economics; Machine learning","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03074837,0.001838934,0.00208561,0.00903638,0.0009201259,0.004910394,0.001104447,0.001744081,0.0007683423],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1361042,0.0007424307,0.001569286,0.02696513,0.001812707,0.004381781,0.003864101,0.002287602,0.0003812652],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004724332,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006250935,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0204932,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008495901,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9593788,0.02772917,0.00224472,0.001378134,0.00843155,0.0008376164],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9255171,0.0597519,0.005259058,0.004760224,0.004389789,0.0003219232],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002287175,0.0003163257,0.03206362,0.001154799,0.0006430013,0.0002767099,0.001596485,0.5864444,0.001971901,0.1359303,0.002887132,0.2364866],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004792934,0.0004925999,0.01629179,0.0007982334,0.000178714,0.0001685672,0.001370759,0.8103386,0.005236218,0.1493137,0.01550036,0.0002624901],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.08353436,0.006840033,0.8968849,0.001138435,0.0001108534,0.0003478595,0.0008509023,0.0002469544,0.01004569],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.692372,0.007647362,0.2967897,0.0002041364,0.00007897683,0.0008186354,0.000909821,0.00009123451,0.001088098],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9692516,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1626149,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.09050916239602833,"score_gpt":0.3356399786467488,"score_spread":0.2451308162507205,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}