{"id":"W2039764381","doi":"10.1111/j.1744-7976.2003.tb00172.x","title":"The Economic Value of Soil Quality under Alternative Management in the Canadian Prairies","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d agroeconomie","topic":"Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada; University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Crop rotation; Environmental science; Soil carbon; Soil quality; Crop; Crop yield; Agricultural engineering; Agriculture; Yield (engineering); Crop production; Agricultural economics; Economic impact analysis; Agroforestry; Soil water; Economics; Geography; Agronomy; Forestry; Soil science; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005481124,0.0003069607,0.000327461,0.000415071,0.001068621,0.00180494,0.001131599,0.0005011724,0.0009802912],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00176592,0.0002631292,0.000419126,0.0007285328,0.00126722,0.0008468876,0.0006115571,0.0004673262,0.0000545886],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03053934,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01156298,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9562121,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9677817,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995696,0.00008661795,0.00001079683,0.0000655825,0.0001013904,0.0001659838],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994942,0.0001624722,0.0000781147,0.00003705824,0.0001329444,0.0000950941],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001946649,0.00006034672,0.04809237,0.00002637387,0.00009063506,0.0001787755,0.0001240021,0.9358093,0.0009304037,0.00505995,0.0004857521,0.008947357],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008147685,0.0001031265,0.08406682,0.00001897224,0.00007740322,0.00006391814,0.0004945015,0.908408,0.0005005725,0.003067472,0.003061157,0.00005654888],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9933491,0.0001553344,0.001142249,0.0003304353,0.000004022668,0.00002046594,0.0003766805,0.00001916717,0.004602436],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984685,0.0001453564,0.0005471269,0.00001627604,0.000001108175,0.000004661062,0.0001345761,0.000003225878,0.0006792336],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0437879,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2215795,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02895971098838826,"score_gpt":0.1987736288100678,"score_spread":0.1698139178216795,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}