{"id":"W2039859676","doi":"10.2460/ajvr.2004.65.1490","title":"Comparison of the cognitive palatability assessment protocol and the two-pan test for use in assessing palatability of two similar foods in dogs","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Veterinary Research","topic":"Human-Animal Interaction Studies","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Palatability; Cognition; Protocol (science); Test (biology); Medicine; Food science; Animal science; Biology; Pathology; Ecology; Psychiatry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003034549,0.0001098225,0.0004190071,0.00009065298,0.00009423988,0.00003229892,0.0002393621,0.00002696539,0.000003425233],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001470618,0.00006746039,0.0001105446,0.0002605037,0.001750335,0.00002722998,0.0003122097,0.0004426605,4.976971e-8],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008119063,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002488462,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004543909,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003937283,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975885,0.0009926112,0.0006678691,0.0002028462,0.0003293853,0.0002188343],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973607,0.001267328,0.0004716197,0.0002387015,0.0006219989,0.00003961869],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002699818,0.0007264208,0.8286933,0.00008571942,0.00005919617,0.0000036778,0.0006147443,0.00007861217,0.1638238,0.000015633,0.000005072413,0.003194019],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00586641,0.008446061,0.9523976,0.0003104295,0.00001663527,0.00004328816,0.006591362,0.0001683548,0.02569532,0.0002301352,0.0001361936,0.00009823975],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9934047,0.00003076597,0.0002196903,0.0002591917,0.00001770164,0.005986516,0.0000189412,7.002657e-7,0.00006176064],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972109,0.000009556681,0.001357028,0.00001751872,0.00003153932,0.001360853,0.000001243358,0.000009261477,0.000002141171],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1381285,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6449183,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1880379608049525,"score_gpt":0.574455247959368,"score_spread":0.3864172871544155,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}