{"id":"W2039920053","doi":"10.1016/j.jpaa.2012.06.004","title":"Bounding invariants of fat points using a coding theory construction","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Pure and Applied Algebra","topic":"Commutative Algebra and Its Applications","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics; Bounding overwatch; Intersection (aeronautics); Combinatorics; Resolution (logic); Code (set theory); Coding (social sciences); Upper and lower bounds; Ideal (ethics); Discrete mathematics; Point (geometry); Scheme (mathematics); Complete intersection; Geometry; Mathematical analysis; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00172449,0.0009554374,0.001272811,0.003537325,0.001933365,0.003150183,0.002456064,0.001861263,0.005724892],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005596685,0.0007795209,0.001404519,0.001743886,0.004889248,0.007347879,0.005856364,0.003972283,0.0005983981],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001636707,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007555485,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001542882,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001431775,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998449,0.0002782968,0.00006474639,0.000255193,0.0005925314,0.0003602908],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996579,0.001586273,0.0002823342,0.0006741887,0.000423442,0.0004547494],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002467624,0.00001618679,0.0001861956,0.00001433223,0.000005099189,0.00003946638,0.0001042023,0.001950941,0.0009602668,0.9937426,0.0004070068,0.002549029],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001792525,0.00002849113,0.0001464044,0.00001390948,0.00001762783,0.00006067706,0.00006829937,0.04306321,0.002007023,0.9533571,0.001196125,0.00002314703],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2364659,0.0003372652,0.7127064,0.0009304321,0.0003710267,0.00009060893,0.0001550909,0.0008696454,0.04807371],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9265659,0.000197821,0.06286004,0.0002666506,0.0002532666,0.00007666599,0.0001647157,0.0002676529,0.009347226],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005724892,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01915163,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04937059452743608,"score_gpt":0.3116300870234883,"score_spread":0.2622594924960522,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}