{"id":"W2039988673","doi":"10.1109/3dui.2007.340783","title":"Exploring the Effects of Environment Density and Target Visibility on Object Selection in 3D Virtual Environments","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Interactive and Immersive Displays","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":157,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"European Regional Development Fund; Vlaamse regering","keywords":"Visibility; Computer science; Cursor (databases); Selection (genetic algorithm); 3D interaction; Human–computer interaction; Artificial intelligence; Virtual machine; Computer vision; Virtual image; Set (abstract data type); Object (grammar); Virtual reality","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003920099,0.00009100943,0.00009702359,0.00006217566,0.00006195892,0.0000117999,0.0001457948,0.00002046947,0.000007445954],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004554052,0.00006522963,0.00002854158,0.00008012474,0.00004113689,0.0003462597,0.0001199031,0.000119773,0.00001564295],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001018883,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004680264,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005941114,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000110791,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991729,0.00007807327,0.0001408638,0.0002630143,0.000176741,0.0001683534],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999425,0.0003209773,0.00004683407,0.0001724324,0.000004628205,0.00003011073],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001674755,0.0005673853,0.07719617,0.00002699927,0.00004061708,0.00001607192,0.004571149,0.0003296643,0.89466,0.006187143,0.00002900227,0.01620832],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001369405,0.0002501375,0.531741,0.000008361496,0.000001556461,0.000001160063,0.00008257612,0.0007194874,0.4669233,0.00004924459,0.00004148591,0.00004470061],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8208112,0.000007320334,0.1785869,0.00001983539,0.0001039114,0.0001535692,1.478567e-7,0.000002893508,0.0003142476],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998991,0.00002407394,0.0007420903,0.0001490999,0.00001254913,0.00000708611,3.484392e-7,0.000002931436,0.00007086723],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4545449,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2659987,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01417035373298597,"score_gpt":0.2227532337392765,"score_spread":0.2085828800062905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}