{"id":"W2040077136","doi":"10.1118/1.1328081","title":"Absorbed‐dose beam quality conversion factors for cylindrical chambers in high energy photon beams","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Medical Physics","topic":"Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":84,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"National Research Council Canada","funders":"National Cancer Institute; National Institutes of Health","keywords":"Absorbed dose; Dosimetry; Calibration; Laser beam quality; Beam (structure); Photon; Primary standard; Calorimeter (particle physics); Ionization chamber; Physics; Materials science; Optics; Nuclear medicine; Nuclear physics; Detector; Ion; Medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005089998,0.0009088451,0.0006913567,0.002215923,0.001001187,0.001534361,0.001678992,0.001117227,0.002899567],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01296891,0.001023177,0.001413469,0.002563369,0.0009761336,0.001188867,0.001127905,0.000897912,0.0008592989],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002516251,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001193635,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009940669,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01275403,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9931937,0.001213709,0.0003637964,0.001280358,0.003561058,0.0003873821],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9890606,0.004378925,0.002629408,0.0012782,0.002457523,0.0001952804],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002023936,0.0001902906,0.09283269,0.001186777,0.0003470077,0.0003349301,0.002258564,0.01137031,0.7912727,0.003432858,0.002811068,0.09193882],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006165493,0.0005153529,0.293816,0.00009116389,0.0001716887,0.0009825856,0.0002271644,0.006937338,0.6842998,0.0005276179,0.01212284,0.0002466973],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6983365,0.008671518,0.2730907,0.000303997,0.0001362892,0.001213029,0.00375834,0.003432931,0.01105655],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8901427,0.001440427,0.1023516,0.0002364511,0.00002358166,0.0004474044,0.002268777,0.000763797,0.002325216],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.009940669,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02691883,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01333889140370654,"score_gpt":0.2922292782446776,"score_spread":0.2788903868409711,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}