{"id":"W2040258355","doi":"10.1075/pc.15.2.06god","title":"A theory of presumption for everyday argumentation","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pragmatics & Cognition","topic":"Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":55,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg; University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Presumption; Defeasible estate; Argumentation theory; Normative; Epistemology; Defeasible reasoning; Foundation (evidence); Function (biology); Set (abstract data type); Law and economics; Sociology; Law; Philosophy; Political science; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008992348,0.0007370608,0.001084671,0.002901474,0.004756403,0.008535993,0.003729319,0.00416407,0.00589149],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01719609,0.0006549772,0.001886333,0.002760048,0.02307929,0.02232464,0.005548641,0.00540731,0.001363818],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004843425,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002662439,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001882526,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001321303,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9929778,0.003824767,0.0005376253,0.0008128888,0.001505643,0.0003411628],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.986752,0.008599137,0.0009195723,0.00218498,0.001107914,0.0004363517],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001949503,0.000002110044,0.00002705305,0.0000140616,0.000001710913,0.00002088432,0.0004351381,0.0001786795,0.00002324829,0.9973972,0.0002227367,0.001675211],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003695473,0.000003322548,0.00002864282,0.00002872387,0.000002497191,0.00004232036,0.0001166234,0.0009534027,0.00003413914,0.9910092,0.007774196,0.000003308591],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.00828866,0.003638131,0.8027431,0.01721125,0.0004365433,0.00009285421,0.0001355467,0.0002167427,0.1672373],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6671743,0.002309528,0.3119723,0.002151471,0.0007611191,0.0004555889,0.0002686769,0.0001792179,0.01472783],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008992348,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04755664,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05674631934493059,"score_gpt":0.2933166530883365,"score_spread":0.236570333743406,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}