{"id":"W2040330713","doi":"10.5840/envirophil20129226","title":"Mick Smith. Against Ecological Sovereignty: Ethics, Biopolitics, and Saving the Natural World","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Philosophy","topic":"History of Science and Medicine","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Biopower; Sovereignty; Applied philosophy; General interest; Environmental ethics; Natural (archaeology); Adam smith; Philosophy; Ecology; Sociology; Contemporary philosophy; Epistemology; Law; Geography; Political science; Archaeology; Economics; Biology; Neoclassical economics; Politics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003078756,0.000141738,0.0001252344,0.00004922443,0.0007893423,0.00003780528,0.0001515933,0.0000405821,0.00138574],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002413393,0.00008868255,0.00005091964,0.00001513804,0.002283225,0.000282124,0.00009529855,0.0004516327,0.0002568742],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009538273,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000974025,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001453143,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002260174,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990491,0.00004995452,0.0001469764,0.0001718193,0.0002512339,0.0003309248],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995377,0.0001189774,0.00005385347,0.0001465598,0.000003041557,0.0001398843],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002009208,0.0003714774,0.005515737,0.00003507915,0.00004437831,0.00001150511,0.05456957,0.000001093031,0.001369557,0.9277388,0.007559451,0.002763231],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004012113,0.00009771722,0.01427766,0.00004282622,0.00003830865,0.00000947743,0.007214596,0.00001583373,0.0001321764,0.01943984,0.9580084,0.0003219637],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7094614,0.005036704,5.6973e-7,0.008196352,0.001725695,0.0002141341,0.00003196831,0.0000449663,0.2752882],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9834329,0.0001074443,0.00002736679,0.0088723,0.002247102,0.000005914281,0.00001123364,0.00001093597,0.005284802],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9504489,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995272,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04420004585300898,"score_gpt":0.2313286651749268,"score_spread":0.1871286193219179,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}