{"id":"W2040334474","doi":"10.1177/0170840602233002","title":"The Ties that Bind: Strategic Actions and Status Structure in the US Investment Banking Industry","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organization Studies","topic":"Business Strategy and Innovation","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":59,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Hierarchy; Dyad; Investment (military); Banking industry; Homophily; Investment banking; Business; Ranking (information retrieval); Industrial organization; Phenomenon; Organizational structure; Marketing; Economics; Sociology; Market economy; Finance; Management; Social science; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002302115,0.000191268,0.0001888063,0.002350188,0.002054428,0.00320063,0.0003592735,0.0008992686,0.003164479],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01426661,0.0002120895,0.0001366818,0.001832195,0.003378256,0.002557713,0.003011211,0.0008404063,0.0002457626],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001641448,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00115434,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01035739,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01481961,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986888,0.0006660146,0.00005728962,0.0001195303,0.0002247094,0.0002437751],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9892547,0.005325938,0.0029736,0.000296096,0.0005657403,0.00158399],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003330953,0.0006000067,0.7788922,0.00006876531,0.00006434116,0.0004794641,0.07146654,0.002177203,0.001897331,0.08233421,0.0007811292,0.06090575],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008088584,0.0003883448,0.8033137,0.0001277493,0.0001001861,0.0003392465,0.08501698,0.009332777,0.0009205534,0.09276208,0.007562538,0.00005497031],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9874122,0.0001469111,0.0006128026,0.0005670211,0.00000338944,0.000007950655,0.00001016225,0.000002902583,0.01123668],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996166,0.0000452817,0.00009742577,0.00002345586,0.000001868448,0.000003272765,0.000006609881,5.442232e-7,0.0002048405],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01035739,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02059418,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08622010195399436,"score_gpt":0.2555387070899658,"score_spread":0.1693186051359714,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}