{"id":"W2040334474","doi":"10.1177/0170840602233002","title":"The Ties that Bind: Strategic Actions and Status Structure in the US Investment Banking Industry","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organization Studies","topic":"Business Strategy and Innovation","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":59,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Hierarchy; Dyad; Investment (military); Banking industry; Homophily; Investment banking; Business; Ranking (information retrieval); Industrial organization; Phenomenon; Organizational structure; Marketing; Economics; Sociology; Market economy; Finance; Management; Social science; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001333805,0.0001198067,0.00009264184,0.0001014477,0.0008653709,0.0004672472,0.00009346558,0.00008066664,0.000117491],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000972327,0.00006940282,0.000007160994,0.001250207,0.0001145974,0.0007056274,0.00006546382,0.0002189198,0.00001218276],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002717091,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000877326,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006374425,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002532114,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993641,0.0000170314,0.0001560419,0.0001339835,0.0001624166,0.0001664768],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994741,0.00004568827,0.0001352508,0.0001173459,0.0002242204,0.000003380426],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007145052,0.00006572177,0.4659353,0.0001285615,0.0001211776,0.000004786095,0.002839212,0.0004438142,0.0003562562,0.5195246,0.008298864,0.002274605],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008832397,0.00001702835,0.8140653,0.00009576527,0.000123373,0.00001136174,0.07308733,0.0008849506,0.0002467316,0.04998363,0.0601006,0.0005006461],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9877726,0.001067584,0.000007475285,0.004869416,0.0002739637,0.0001683805,0.000001738994,0.00004639047,0.005792378],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970859,0.0005597813,0.000009703436,0.001951258,0.0002366556,0.000007766987,0.00001678713,0.00001210144,0.0001200676],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.469541,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6655821,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08622010195399436,"score_gpt":0.2555387070899658,"score_spread":0.1693186051359714,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}