{"id":"W2040394309","doi":"10.1111/j.1747-4949.2008.00190.x","title":"Design of the Economic Evaluation for the Interventional Management of Stroke (III) Trial","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Stroke","topic":"Acute Ischemic Stroke Management","field":"Medicine","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke","keywords":"Medicine; Stroke (engine); Cost effectiveness; Quality of life (healthcare); Rehabilitation; Economic evaluation; Cost–benefit analysis; Physical therapy; Quality-adjusted life year; Intensive care medicine; Acute stroke; Randomized controlled trial; Surgery; Risk analysis (engineering); Nursing","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03576769,0.004442408,0.006404337,0.001329366,0.0007899717,0.003659292,0.001801364,0.005021221,0.02205483],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05101335,0.001102532,0.005088802,0.001494838,0.002366035,0.002405104,0.002475051,0.004150297,0.003141407],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001994109,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00513644,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009937624,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007745333,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9515477,0.04169296,0.001515524,0.002179798,0.001387599,0.001676422],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9878882,0.006318544,0.002467481,0.001238097,0.000913127,0.001174544],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"randomized_trial","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.938283,0.003069674,0.00256688,0.005083794,0.005931035,0.0002061363,0.00008722476,0.00363848,0.0004114218,0.008357143,0.008495909,0.02386927],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.9374548,0.02567464,0.002012246,0.001327228,0.005110127,0.0001082903,0.00006180086,0.008276275,0.0004860685,0.008754762,0.01064357,0.00009023119],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"protocol","genre_gemma":"protocol","genre_scores_codex":[0.1518687,0.01481399,0.04204834,0.01035518,0.009452743,0.7149317,0.0163851,0.001110409,0.0390339],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2748381,0.001985105,0.02467193,0.004658272,0.001060477,0.6845466,0.00272347,0.00008168499,0.005434222],"genre_candidate":"protocol","genre_consensus":"protocol","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9642323,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1891599,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06940294463940747,"score_gpt":0.3406814248957598,"score_spread":0.2712784802563523,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}