{"id":"W2040575221","doi":"10.1065/lca2005.12.242","title":"LUCAS - A New LCIA Method Used for a Canadian-Specific Context","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment","topic":"Environmental Impact and Sustainability","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":107,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Polytechnique Montréal","funders":"Électricité de France; Fonds Québécois de la Recherche sur la Nature et les Technologies","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Environmental science; Environmental resource management; Vulnerability (computing); Work (physics); Computer science; Environmental planning; Risk analysis (engineering); Engineering; Business; Geography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009350133,0.0001225046,0.00016931,0.00005815284,0.0001195646,0.000110627,0.0006469538,0.0000401855,0.001574257],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004969584,0.00008674851,0.0001698867,0.0000683677,0.00008487771,0.0002746132,0.00008832815,0.000160635,0.00002836109],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001736961,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002703631,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04264668,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02033066,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984546,0.00008173528,0.0004451111,0.000132187,0.0006409577,0.0002453655],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990603,0.0002122946,0.0002795544,0.0001570918,0.00003716206,0.0002535916],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006213247,0.001067355,0.5271806,0.00001097267,0.0005893077,0.0001657881,0.002213085,0.05990214,0.01542484,0.01508919,0.2829007,0.09483473],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002110159,0.0002019518,0.7038686,0.00001659016,0.00003770382,0.00009989998,0.001350758,0.002920677,0.0008938462,0.02233332,0.2659378,0.0002287361],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.938006,0.0001327275,0.03859586,0.01706928,0.0006546006,0.0003617336,0.00002362877,0.000007722115,0.005148477],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9848952,0.00001377761,0.01250302,0.001286979,0.0004387252,0.000007382659,0.000005157402,0.00001321009,0.0008364885],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.176688,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993384,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01832005483895405,"score_gpt":0.3231081534453897,"score_spread":0.3047880986064356,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}