{"id":"W2040658269","doi":"10.1371/journal.pbio.1002010","title":"Grant Application Review: The Case of Transparency","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS Biology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Japan Society for the Promotion of Science; National Health and Medical Research Council; Medical Research Council; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; European Commission; Tel Aviv University; Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council; Austrian Science Fund; National Natural Science Foundation of China; Fonds De La Recherche Scientifique - FNRS; National Institutes of Health; Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung; King's College London; Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft; Wellcome Trust; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Legitimacy; Robustness (evolution); Biology; Transformative learning; Perspective (graphical); Data science; Political science; Computer science; Sociology; Law; Politics; Artificial intelligence; Genetics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.4335221,0.000879163,0.002431724,0.006389574,0.01632925,0.03419019,0.007279902,0.03835157,0.01194612],"category_scores_gemma":[0.7160491,0.002196749,0.001804031,0.006722183,0.06640483,0.041471,0.01872054,0.02845575,0.002907584],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01401094,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06132234,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007746148,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005443112,"domain_scores_codex":[0.4860075,0.3349583,0.02304467,0.03364008,0.101426,0.02092344],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.1145246,0.6968429,0.04118846,0.08896778,0.04860674,0.009869558],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005320751,0.00002758725,0.0009688695,0.0002121417,0.00005456293,0.0003958723,0.006122136,0.0003102121,0.0001277732,0.9454678,0.02510655,0.02115336],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001262193,0.0000405033,0.0009492455,0.000724046,0.00005433609,0.000482446,0.001579011,0.001354102,0.0004227961,0.8810086,0.1131585,0.0001001348],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01409282,0.004921397,0.05308797,0.6916817,0.003599244,0.0004009624,0.0001534892,0.0003316831,0.2317308],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8472661,0.002778108,0.02634739,0.08640444,0.009122943,0.001357988,0.0001013657,0.0004945182,0.02612715],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5664779,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6985681,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.5648574577525743,"score_gpt":0.5704503019238251,"score_spread":0.005592844171250722,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}