{"id":"W2040664834","doi":"10.1016/j.jneb.2011.03.006","title":"Nutrition Program Quality Assurance through a Formalized Process of On-site Program Review","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior","topic":"Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quality assurance; Strengths and weaknesses; Process (computing); Protocol (science); Process management; Nutrition Education; Quality (philosophy); Program assurance; Engineering management; Compliance (psychology); Business; Computer science; Medical education; Medicine; Engineering; Psychology; Gerontology; Marketing; Service (business); Alternative medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.2362614,0.00120259,0.002154288,0.01471997,0.004486544,0.008902409,0.008435586,0.002141756,0.006490391],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3045152,0.001388077,0.001719233,0.005947209,0.001500553,0.005549667,0.01001198,0.004236545,0.001988823],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009600276,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06904354,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006353123,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02104927,"domain_scores_codex":[0.757567,0.1672876,0.02624831,0.009501224,0.03589008,0.003505773],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.3898199,0.1721934,0.07016706,0.05545965,0.2933432,0.01901672],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008257994,0.004024757,0.01679488,0.004371971,0.0006398672,0.0003181743,0.006003411,0.002031937,0.004982925,0.001573473,0.02823271,0.9302],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005358514,0.02836788,0.2455435,0.02294786,0.004627059,0.001800936,0.02338644,0.0341364,0.04284513,0.01562503,0.574019,0.001342388],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.240076,0.0175948,0.4097663,0.04855116,0.005953977,0.2070975,0.003062807,0.008340976,0.05955647],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4189817,0.006754887,0.5010425,0.007241057,0.002210728,0.04255557,0.003295382,0.001212273,0.01670584],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2362614,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9418256,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2652515401724529,"score_gpt":0.5599880714803314,"score_spread":0.2947365313078785,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}