{"id":"W2040727170","doi":"10.1016/j.jhydrol.2008.11.031","title":"Impact of decadal and century-scale oscillations on hydroclimate trend analyses","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Hydrology","topic":"Climate variability and models","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":89,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Geological Survey of Canada","funders":"Natural Resources Canada","keywords":"Climatology; Environmental science; Trend analysis; Climate change; Series (stratigraphy); Scale (ratio); Pacific decadal oscillation; Historical record; Geography; Geology; El Niño Southern Oscillation; Statistics; Mathematics; Oceanography; Cartography; History","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000201653,0.00008507809,0.0002538081,0.00009136403,0.00007788734,0.000003347716,0.00009570084,0.00006396294,0.0006212904],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003552629,0.00006037885,0.0001399053,0.0001197818,0.0002572702,0.0001254694,0.00005024696,0.000124299,0.000008938435],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006441979,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001462278,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000117269,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007553661,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991547,0.00006852895,0.0003430904,0.0001082797,0.0001642183,0.0001611572],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994031,0.0001205058,0.0002518011,0.0001140914,0.000008796027,0.0001017411],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003002537,0.0003992887,0.7404215,0.000004884599,0.00008687409,0.00003826207,0.001136926,0.1764448,0.08014025,0.00002993061,0.000495858,0.0005011556],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001409611,0.002690785,0.9691643,0.0000132237,0.0001163858,0.001463168,0.00003734007,0.0210036,0.001356308,0.001661288,0.0009020646,0.0001819449],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9970688,0.00005876839,0.00005021205,0.0001742446,0.00005054779,0.00003224305,0.00001237001,0.000003240935,0.002549539],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992284,0.0003892351,0.0002849708,0.00004939349,0.00002501313,3.079258e-7,0.000001237262,0.000004563828,0.00001692619],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2287427,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6802694,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04090031283383196,"score_gpt":0.3259227881256127,"score_spread":0.2850224752917808,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}