{"id":"W2040729641","doi":"10.1371/journal.pbio.0040265","title":"Similarity Selection and the Evolution of Sex: Revisiting the Red Queen","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS Biology","topic":"Evolution and Genetic Dynamics","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":67,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Biology; Selection (genetic algorithm); Evolution of sexual reproduction; Evolutionary biology; Similarity (geometry); Population; Sexual selection; Genotype; Genetic Fitness; Host (biology); Natural selection; Kin selection; Genetic similarity; Experimental evolution; Genetics; Biological evolution; Genetic diversity; Demography; Gene; Artificial intelligence; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002906734,0.00006910424,0.0000992674,0.00001473893,0.0001095456,0.000005245792,0.0000909631,0.0001131958,0.000004829059],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000100285,0.00004077533,0.00004068519,0.00006445942,0.0002289786,0.000001031045,0.00006381764,0.00007151932,7.636588e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001316638,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002782269,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000308446,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001313117,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993156,0.0002117,0.000160848,0.0001585669,0.00003804937,0.0001152398],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996445,0.00003551087,0.00009006546,0.0001533178,0.00006512862,0.00001146863],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002280835,0.00004702157,0.1145444,0.00003365984,0.0001076734,1.445628e-7,0.00006201543,0.0005222793,0.8460593,0.03537659,0.0008257524,0.002193103],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009971356,0.001361732,0.4941677,0.00008114497,0.0005448185,0.0001669863,0.001354094,0.1276246,0.1865854,0.08792729,0.08892217,0.001292744],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9848274,0.00133881,0.008002124,0.00293713,0.00004971527,0.00023061,0.00001315367,0.00001238879,0.002588654],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988899,0.0001186751,0.0002707665,0.00010199,0.0002728215,0.000009709536,0.0000450726,0.000005200208,0.0002858505],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6594738,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.166277,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.004542139675211347,"score_gpt":0.2174340604782016,"score_spread":0.2128919208029902,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}