{"id":"W2040784458","doi":"10.1111/1468-5906.00183","title":"The Myth of Pluralism, Diversity, and Vigor: The Constitutional Privilege of Protestantism in the United States and Canada","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":110,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"Pew Charitable Trusts","keywords":"Privilege (computing); Pluralism (philosophy); Mythology; Protestantism; Citation; Diversity (politics); Sociology; Law; History; Political science; Classics; Philosophy; Epistemology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002914699,0.00005444077,0.0000983565,0.00004420583,0.004463944,0.00006547038,0.0003239619,0.0000157203,0.000001433514],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004250799,0.00002340644,0.00002986658,0.0003016426,0.004631053,0.00005648741,0.00007804908,0.0001134816,2.822304e-8],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003895047,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008819549,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2536876,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1942427,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986151,0.0003100779,0.0002302608,0.00007712125,0.0006191484,0.0001482778],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978681,0.001444977,0.0002599193,0.0001119047,0.0002814751,0.00003358226],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002407388,0.00005657374,0.01615326,0.000005860122,0.00003656213,0.000001391745,0.0119259,0.000151725,0.00001223946,0.9648253,0.0067387,0.00006836953],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011376,0.0002988489,0.01332169,0.00008715587,0.0001561529,0.00005786502,0.1626955,0.000114539,0.00007356695,0.02228982,0.7996291,0.0001382126],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9934637,0.000544546,0.00006987764,0.004149944,0.0004678984,0.0006225495,0.00004326425,0.000001102294,0.0006371223],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992123,0.0004313746,0.0000145412,0.0001154843,0.0000187827,0.000003951259,8.60764e-7,0.000001064809,0.0002016655],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9425355,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9980778,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0252229316483541,"score_gpt":0.2883319935130499,"score_spread":0.2631090618646958,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}