{"id":"W2040867850","doi":"10.1002/meet.2009.1450460112","title":"Institutional Review boards: Ethics, regulations and the research agenda","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology","topic":"Psychology of Social Influence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Institutional review board; Engineering ethics; Public relations; Quality (philosophy); Research ethics; Field (mathematics); Political science; Qualitative research; Sociology; Psychology; Social science; Engineering; Epistemology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.5890459,0.001430611,0.002761373,0.005155743,0.01318947,0.04473667,0.007487682,0.03729005,0.01327441],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5435377,0.003801125,0.00111251,0.007885711,0.02467547,0.01677465,0.01126664,0.03139079,0.01142489],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01623317,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1324611,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004898305,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00495384,"domain_scores_codex":[0.3724322,0.5152718,0.04541909,0.01003931,0.04392585,0.01291166],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.2949998,0.4164976,0.03993157,0.07098588,0.1387904,0.03879484],"domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"evaluation","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004090967,0.0003871089,0.00247032,0.001811102,0.00005330136,0.000404808,0.01033829,0.0006298507,0.001468622,0.5537151,0.3389962,0.08931627],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003979907,0.0002064207,0.003441372,0.009448913,0.00004794414,0.0002086973,0.006170182,0.001607311,0.001232193,0.1086451,0.868428,0.0001658035],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01091204,0.01876954,0.05702613,0.7577307,0.027724,0.02555612,0.00118878,0.0007603202,0.1003324],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2150984,0.0170119,0.1491774,0.3703486,0.02182334,0.1287991,0.002597394,0.0007940463,0.09434973],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96271,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5067796,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08672176774172466,"score_gpt":0.4382536254899478,"score_spread":0.3515318577482232,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}