{"id":"W2040939530","doi":"10.1016/s1060-3743(01)00042-x","title":"The effect of corrections and commentaries on the journal writing accuracy of minority- and majority-language students","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Second Language Writing","topic":"EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":204,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Mathematics education; Peer feedback; Significant difference; Psychology; Written language; Second language writing; Pedagogy; Second language; Linguistics; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03885729,0.0006547144,0.0009630875,0.002913732,0.002669886,0.004923732,0.001567211,0.002193673,0.006883722],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5000989,0.0006997068,0.001082199,0.002008358,0.001755322,0.002518373,0.002855859,0.002596224,0.002700218],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00148928,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003069363,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005217318,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006651855,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9417821,0.02948956,0.009367015,0.004967854,0.01203696,0.002356414],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.1645799,0.6766679,0.06981131,0.01949708,0.05911479,0.01032904],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.03495309,0.003591309,0.6665441,0.0007810474,0.001017162,0.00114949,0.04899688,0.00113716,0.01126043,0.0008777466,0.0147388,0.2149527],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001011927,0.004946162,0.9338765,0.0005484024,0.00107319,0.001148136,0.02288617,0.003940898,0.02035414,0.001381364,0.008547428,0.0002857032],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9928792,0.0003447623,0.0003051951,0.001961932,0.0003722801,0.00004984806,0.0002742514,0.00009524423,0.003717258],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947369,0.0001608275,0.0008021941,0.0004356594,0.0001818048,0.00004079091,0.0002508112,0.0001189789,0.003271995],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03885729,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2054995,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01251544224932242,"score_gpt":0.2829644590340932,"score_spread":0.2704490167847708,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}