{"id":"W2040984821","doi":"10.1002/sim.2507","title":"An innovative application of Bayesian disease mapping methods to patient safety research: a Canadian adverse medical event study","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Statistics in Medicine","topic":"Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria; Children’s Health Research Institute; University of British Columbia","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Ministry of Health, British Columbia","keywords":"Adverse effect; Event (particle physics); Bayesian probability; Computer science; Adverse Event Reporting System; Patient safety; Medicine; Statistics; Artificial intelligence; Internal medicine; Mathematics; Health care","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01465436,0.00044411,0.0005213286,0.002574094,0.002763786,0.001692465,0.001784471,0.0008950573,0.001890008],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03443428,0.0002677811,0.0007111023,0.004536978,0.001696635,0.0007180404,0.002098776,0.001218094,0.00009731954],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01388319,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04343136,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9517972,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9646925,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9933662,0.004287226,0.0001700779,0.0004460808,0.001508135,0.0002222988],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9887002,0.00639436,0.0004562325,0.0008728605,0.002908253,0.0006681466],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004615848,0.0003061146,0.1379939,0.000665349,0.0005489564,0.001019922,0.006951452,0.03865639,0.00154366,0.300475,0.02464189,0.4867357],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001061511,0.0005602175,0.3804324,0.0009218737,0.000984611,0.001023985,0.007641582,0.2134746,0.001298406,0.2179494,0.1742052,0.0004462824],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3431278,0.01405364,0.5050819,0.0540882,0.0006714592,0.002681849,0.004348283,0.0002743145,0.0756726],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7648913,0.005427391,0.2201334,0.001966885,0.0001421769,0.0007382815,0.0006744727,0.00003778489,0.005988255],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04820275,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1007301,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.3067687218428774,"score_gpt":0.5485006337421326,"score_spread":0.2417319118992552,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}