{"id":"W2041022857","doi":"10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.10.065","title":"Interpersonal perception in the context of doctor–patient relationships: A dyadic analysis of doctor–patient communication","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Science & Medicine","topic":"Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":162,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada; Université Laval; Hôpital Saint-François d'Assise; University of Calgary; Centre hospitalier universitaire de Québec","funders":"Canada Research Chairs; University of Ottawa","keywords":"Dyad; Doctor–patient relationship; Intraclass correlation; Interpersonal communication; Context (archaeology); Social skills; Interpersonal relationship; Medicine; Perception; Family medicine; Psychology; Clinical psychology; Social psychology; Psychometrics; Psychiatry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003490272,0.0001917073,0.0004841711,0.001215945,0.003232592,0.004059376,0.0006342267,0.0008816103,0.00414133],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01883516,0.0003316098,0.0003190557,0.001238775,0.001464906,0.002464257,0.003442112,0.001656895,0.0003153795],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00138037,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001870377,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006697367,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008525871,"domain_scores_codex":[0.994752,0.004022961,0.0001544485,0.0002632372,0.0004325305,0.0003748671],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9838817,0.01120287,0.00191532,0.0004797858,0.001187612,0.001332665],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007066044,0.0003687516,0.2212341,0.0002596766,0.0001795786,0.001474106,0.7409683,0.0004285832,0.005536436,0.003627904,0.0009802225,0.02423574],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003735391,0.0003609489,0.4066398,0.000101819,0.0001411344,0.00101546,0.5834835,0.001671085,0.0008427797,0.001872384,0.003753993,0.00007980598],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9932722,0.0002675083,0.001198436,0.0004812081,0.00001655851,0.00003601848,0.00007730654,0.000005792917,0.004644971],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988985,0.0001311827,0.0004961469,0.00004950799,0.000008301293,0.00003198412,0.0000507125,0.000006073697,0.0003275674],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.006697367,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01845855,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2170203202353748,"score_gpt":0.4693397747451357,"score_spread":0.2523194545097609,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}