{"id":"W2041022857","doi":"10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.10.065","title":"Interpersonal perception in the context of doctor–patient relationships: A dyadic analysis of doctor–patient communication","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Science & Medicine","topic":"Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":162,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada; Université Laval; Hôpital Saint-François d'Assise; University of Calgary; Centre hospitalier universitaire de Québec","funders":"Canada Research Chairs; University of Ottawa","keywords":"Dyad; Doctor–patient relationship; Intraclass correlation; Interpersonal communication; Context (archaeology); Social skills; Interpersonal relationship; Medicine; Perception; Family medicine; Psychology; Clinical psychology; Social psychology; Psychometrics; Psychiatry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002589694,0.0001429094,0.0004773439,0.0007829261,0.001331895,0.000005662736,0.0009906921,0.0001438908,0.0002302394],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002088967,0.0001031166,0.0001071493,0.004228201,0.001450336,0.0002715131,0.000108616,0.0008467002,0.000007207872],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007447834,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004558978,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003273305,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001460343,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9942719,0.002530849,0.001386642,0.0002732704,0.00115366,0.0003836267],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959052,0.001284138,0.001016191,0.0008448861,0.0008446538,0.0001049116],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006604619,0.0001543,0.1233404,0.00003393654,0.00002225136,2.407293e-7,0.8446918,0.00001093016,0.001088663,0.01565672,0.000546816,0.01438784],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005486863,0.0003883382,0.5724759,0.0003795465,0.0001241547,3.260824e-7,0.4229195,0.001110505,0.00001009821,0.001033558,0.0009113171,0.00009813259],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9764337,0.0005790525,0.00004737096,0.01479578,0.0001937656,0.001050301,0.00002250348,0.0000238237,0.006853718],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971722,0.00007232278,0.0001069727,0.002407525,0.00004950188,0.00009129844,0.000077651,0.000005462265,0.00001705737],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4491355,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999682,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2170203202353748,"score_gpt":0.4693397747451357,"score_spread":0.2523194545097609,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}