{"id":"W2041138563","doi":"10.1007/s12350-009-9171-0","title":"An investigation of potential sources of artifacts in SPECT-CT myocardial perfusion studies","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Nuclear Cardiology","topic":"Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics","field":"Medicine","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Correction for attenuation; Imaging phantom; Attenuation; Medicine; Iterative reconstruction; Myocardial perfusion imaging; Perfusion; Nuclear medicine; Artifact (error); Perfusion scanning; Artificial intelligence; Pattern recognition (psychology); Radiology; Biomedical engineering; Computer science; Positron emission tomography; Physics; Optics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005793125,0.0000935331,0.0008039905,0.0002710935,0.00002049455,0.000003921423,0.00006243734,0.00004160023,0.00000570437],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004752892,0.00007648827,0.0002884776,0.0001228128,0.0001685351,0.0000798149,0.00001788096,0.0002272248,0.000002232635],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000468322,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007733679,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000009732127,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":5.158309e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998831,0.0001889562,0.0005169085,0.000097835,0.0002320032,0.000133314],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990907,0.00009564017,0.0003341016,0.0001467843,0.0002447869,0.00008799011],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001460652,0.0001876814,0.7232822,0.00009544545,0.0005577665,0.002385852,0.003620808,0.008278218,0.2402294,0.0001855334,0.004673688,0.01504275],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001524857,0.002021841,0.9862365,0.000175083,0.000327212,0.002784303,0.001771742,0.00008417403,0.004232394,0.000504729,0.0002622288,0.00007491456],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9969141,0.001321698,0.00001385025,0.0009463061,0.0003801906,0.00006716339,0.000002255217,0.000006465114,0.0003479988],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982966,0.0005041957,0.0003633913,0.0002364685,0.0005855907,1.223943e-7,0.000001593099,0.000009523867,0.000002546127],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2629544,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3119101,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01958648237943695,"score_gpt":0.2890204051134408,"score_spread":0.2694339227340039,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}