{"id":"W2041144461","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9353.2004.00208.x","title":"Is Geographical Targeting Cost-Effective? The Case of the Conservation Reserve Enhancement Program in Illinois","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Agricultural Economics","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"University of Guelph; Farm Service Agency; University of New South Wales; Illinois Department of Natural Resources; U.S. Department of Agriculture","keywords":"Conservation Reserve Program; Natural resource economics; Economics; Nature reserve; Business; Geography; Archaeology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002464071,0.0002114303,0.0003332391,0.0006348917,0.001040876,0.002443493,0.000937747,0.001468914,0.002468557],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005437767,0.0001806853,0.0002862487,0.001027477,0.001444628,0.001519024,0.001180876,0.0010381,0.0001363016],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004443595,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003448878,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07096499,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1071012,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979928,0.001045029,0.00003313554,0.000117065,0.0002819342,0.0005299775],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968718,0.002069102,0.0004298472,0.00007805634,0.0002811469,0.000270073],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001449125,0.001577138,0.2912384,0.0004591032,0.0003492953,0.00545275,0.002879034,0.276244,0.005427049,0.2421357,0.01685319,0.1559352],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007248644,0.002137863,0.2528518,0.0006154092,0.0007361533,0.001666432,0.02430919,0.5333428,0.00637847,0.1257628,0.05120588,0.0002683041],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9523311,0.0009334014,0.00316993,0.0109981,0.00002617719,0.00006790098,0.0001048111,0.0000397618,0.03232883],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969727,0.0003479165,0.0006902877,0.000298721,0.00001908549,0.00001807598,0.00002736406,0.00000422101,0.001621687],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07096499,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1411039,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04913515172352104,"score_gpt":0.2526191783819521,"score_spread":0.203484026658431,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}