{"id":"W2041163982","doi":"10.1021/es991026x","title":"Characterization of Contaminated Soils Using Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy and Cryogenic-Scanning Electron Microscopy","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Science & Technology","topic":"Groundwater flow and contamination studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Scanning electron microscope; Microscopy; Confocal laser scanning microscopy; Characterization (materials science); Soil water; Materials science; Fluorescence microscope; Contamination; Environmental scanning electron microscope; Microstructure; Analytical Chemistry (journal); Environmental chemistry; Chemistry; Fluorescence; Nanotechnology; Environmental science; Optics; Composite material; Soil science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002667417,0.0002756418,0.0002260829,0.0007103985,0.000373832,0.0003267908,0.0003454326,0.0003051781,0.001007732],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004226259,0.0001729877,0.0001653968,0.000433435,0.0003037699,0.0003692209,0.0002039111,0.0002963821,0.0002430356],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003294236,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002451555,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035572,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004627334,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998702,0.00001102246,0.000007934989,0.00001849531,0.00006445028,0.00002784563],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996616,0.00006520037,0.00004694872,0.00003396664,0.0001675851,0.00002475922],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002434363,0.00001279806,0.001073351,0.00002578171,0.00000418051,0.0001041379,0.00004960969,0.0001596315,0.9970149,0.0001292678,0.00002542767,0.0013766],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001451915,0.000148979,0.04384718,0.00001485913,0.00002046931,0.001087339,0.0002364484,0.00599981,0.9451494,0.0002812959,0.003178969,0.00002070473],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9717793,0.000505131,0.02459394,0.00008137914,0.000008696923,0.00008298951,0.0009493191,0.0001191377,0.001880101],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.957998,0.0009382444,0.03779158,0.0000711289,0.00001106125,0.0001438474,0.001286908,0.00007066178,0.001688487],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0035572,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.007072985,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.005458745628460882,"score_gpt":0.2326620987979153,"score_spread":0.2272033531694544,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}