{"id":"W2041246762","doi":"10.1016/j.canep.2010.11.002","title":"Oxidative balance score and risk of prostate cancer: Results from a case-cohort study","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cancer Epidemiology","topic":"Antioxidant Activity and Oxidative Stress","field":"Medicine","cited_by":67,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; Public Health Ontario; University of Toronto; Cancer Care Ontario","funders":"National Cancer Institute; Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Health Canada; U.S. Department of Agriculture","keywords":"Medicine; Prostate cancer; Internal medicine; Cohort; Prospective cohort study; Hazard ratio; Oxidative stress; Cancer; Cohort study; Prostate; Oncology; Confidence interval","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001287832,0.0002341231,0.001076257,0.00007623294,0.0001113317,0.000003213102,0.00009321668,0.0001833947,0.0001300806],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002794635,0.0001824584,0.00007462162,0.0001473048,0.0006223915,0.0001047452,0.00008581381,0.0007700262,0.000003951981],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004442488,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001524308,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04625466,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01775375,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976988,0.0005366768,0.0006136694,0.0007016987,0.0001045953,0.0003445394],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963953,0.002097924,0.0006717072,0.0004600486,0.0002052031,0.0001698474],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001306259,0.0001574059,0.9831393,0.00003875257,0.000554248,0.0001746236,0.001487385,0.00001238996,0.004723643,0.00005738232,0.0006916398,0.007656977],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002866601,0.0003990199,0.9908351,0.0001299945,0.0004604999,0.00005951845,0.0005927118,0.0003517654,0.003024964,0.0004742212,0.0006349816,0.0001706342],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9932356,0.001863808,0.0000966357,0.0009717842,0.0004918032,0.001129708,0.001995164,0.00003546186,0.0001800465],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944252,0.003881758,0.0006242931,0.0001952135,0.0003302466,0.0002103526,0.00005449233,0.00001976885,0.0002586471],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02850091,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.990701,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04573281753924556,"score_gpt":0.361883222803656,"score_spread":0.3161504052644104,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}