{"id":"W2041253975","doi":"10.2134/jeq2009.0157","title":"A Watershed‐scale Assessment of Cost‐Effectiveness of Sediment Abatement with Flow Diversion Terraces","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Environmental Quality","topic":"Soil erosion and sediment transport","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada; University of New Brunswick","funders":"Environment Canada","keywords":"Watershed; Sediment; Environmental science; Hydrology (agriculture); Scale (ratio); Flow (mathematics); Water resource management; Geology; Geography; Geotechnical engineering; Geomorphology; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001206569,0.0001196324,0.0003153725,0.00001526373,0.00005834856,0.000007134442,0.0001756898,0.00006016542,0.000769876],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000003198126,0.00004306356,0.0001458073,0.00005645083,0.0001463241,0.0001391186,0.0000398509,0.0001707138,0.00000132798],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005189353,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008540766,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007182027,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004018014,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984412,0.0001735775,0.0004926922,0.0001352615,0.0006282851,0.000128964],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992239,0.000127004,0.0004594162,0.00006029594,0.000023982,0.0001054057],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022968,0.0006442788,0.3338048,0.00002113651,0.00002913721,0.000002357433,0.00009754024,0.00003221033,0.6615739,0.000005683096,0.000008022481,0.003551167],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006624231,0.0009630386,0.8182428,0.00005008654,0.00003351455,0.000005387899,0.0006219976,0.00001857733,0.1789149,0.00001600805,0.0003907351,0.00008048435],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9993074,0.00001696888,0.00003622599,0.0001236328,0.0001490168,0.0002020689,0.00006557764,0.000003285783,0.00009584954],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999293,0.00003685031,0.0005633853,0.00002656936,0.0000344348,0.000003007093,0.00002650244,9.619947e-7,0.00001531919],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.484438,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8429602,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02109860744936579,"score_gpt":0.2697743666810597,"score_spread":0.2486757592316939,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}