{"id":"W2041260947","doi":"10.1016/j.joi.2010.07.005","title":"What's familiar is excellent: The impact of exposure effect on perceived journal quality","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Informetrics","topic":"Knowledge Management and Sharing","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":55,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; Lakehead University","funders":"","keywords":"Ranking (information retrieval); Journal ranking; Preference; Psychology; Interpretation (philosophy); Quality (philosophy); Perception; Test (biology); Field (mathematics); Statistics; Computer science; Information retrieval; Library science; Epistemology; Mathematics; Citation; Philosophy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007849666,0.0001348015,0.0003261236,0.0006641998,0.0004716624,0.0005191746,0.0007701939,0.0001301785,0.00031127],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003409812,0.00007333411,0.0006114868,0.001090717,0.0001543738,0.00128759,0.00006071079,0.0009736057,0.00002200573],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001448394,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002525846,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001616645,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007743726,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975993,0.0002140867,0.0007494767,0.00006542543,0.001081622,0.0002900918],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969495,0.0009679288,0.001053646,0.0001912376,0.0006548114,0.0001828755],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006090593,0.0004506261,0.2503357,0.0001114312,0.0006845669,0.000034482,0.1364304,0.0002484006,0.001672487,0.002491694,0.02568338,0.5812478],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002198231,0.003173458,0.9275402,0.0002145574,0.0001332451,0.00002948467,0.02935344,0.00008931986,0.0005049774,0.001236563,0.03520304,0.0003234562],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9666696,0.0002302029,0.00004012174,0.0002908707,0.002210499,0.0001285907,0.00000129742,0.000005291666,0.03042356],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963806,0.001845298,0.00005903848,0.0000823489,0.0007922848,4.558425e-7,2.215773e-7,0.000007143318,0.0008326463],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6772045,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5006413,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03543923403875162,"score_gpt":0.3812089441243721,"score_spread":0.3457697100856205,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}