{"id":"W2041260947","doi":"10.1016/j.joi.2010.07.005","title":"What's familiar is excellent: The impact of exposure effect on perceived journal quality","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Informetrics","topic":"Knowledge Management and Sharing","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":55,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; Lakehead University","funders":"","keywords":"Ranking (information retrieval); Journal ranking; Preference; Psychology; Interpretation (philosophy); Quality (philosophy); Perception; Test (biology); Field (mathematics); Statistics; Computer science; Information retrieval; Library science; Epistemology; Mathematics; Citation; Philosophy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006839896,0.0002239395,0.0007085969,0.0007243445,0.0008279076,0.003236275,0.0007437199,0.001427446,0.01522413],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06929068,0.000356598,0.0007832253,0.0007738649,0.001351983,0.001941792,0.002186452,0.001824881,0.0006349434],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005111471,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008327565,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00176994,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001533209,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9947039,0.002709848,0.0004208231,0.0006101856,0.001034133,0.0005210444],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7868529,0.1832851,0.01077712,0.004034249,0.003114871,0.01193577],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.02387118,0.01665205,0.8768318,0.000452392,0.001309997,0.0007338569,0.01348407,0.001054558,0.01569709,0.001063407,0.0009403411,0.04790929],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003387599,0.003410381,0.9875869,0.00004230566,0.0004878571,0.0001865709,0.004049275,0.0007749103,0.001725794,0.0006616188,0.0006785898,0.00005714765],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9976011,0.00008274544,0.0001955536,0.0002482175,0.00002042789,0.00001764794,0.0000532787,0.00001225794,0.001768883],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990172,0.00004410853,0.0002193132,0.0000757369,0.00002734997,0.00001507542,0.00004242167,0.00001193076,0.0005467043],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9992757,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05092978,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03543923403875162,"score_gpt":0.3812089441243721,"score_spread":0.3457697100856205,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}